netdev - Re: Should we report bus width/speed via ethtool?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 6 Dec 2012 02:06:28 +0000
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
CC:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	e1000-devel list <e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: Should we report bus width/speed via ethtool?

On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 13:35 -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
> It seems the only way to get the current pci-e bus speed & width
> in ixgbe (and probably many other NICs) is by parsing output
> of lspci -vvv.
> 
> I'd personally find it easier if this info were available via
> ethtool API.
> 
> Any opinions on adding this info?  I was thinking something like:
[...]

This is nothing specific to network devices, so putting it in ethtool
info is totally inappropriate.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html