lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 10:50:26 -0800 From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com> To: Eric Dumazet <erdnetdev@...il.com> CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [RFC] IP_MAX_MTU value On 12/21/2012 10:34 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 10:19 -0800, Rick Jones wrote: > >> If you go beyond the protocol limit of an IPv4 datagram, won't it be >> necessary to start being a bit more conditional on IPv4 vs IPv6? >> > > This IP_MAX_MTU is really an IPv4 thing (static to net/ipv4/route.c) OK. Doesn't this: if (mtu > IP_MAX_MTU) mtu = IP_MAX_MTU; mean it should be OK to go to 0xFFFF but not 0x10000? Since 65535 is the limit of an IPv4 datagram and so I would think would be the maximum MTU for an IPv4 interface. rick -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists