netdev - Re: TCP sequence number inference attack on Linux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 21 Dec 2012 16:01:21 -0800
From:	Eric Dumazet <erdnetdev@...il.com>
To:	Zhiyun Qian <zhiyunq@...ch.edu>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP sequence number inference attack on Linux

On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 18:52 -0500, Zhiyun Qian wrote:

> It seems that it is not straightforward to simply move tcp_ack()
> before tcp_validate_incoming() as tcp_ack() currently assumes the tcp
> sequence number is already validated and it may adjust certain states
> purely depending on the ACK number. I guess the solution is to extract
> all safety checks out and put at the very beginning. The rest of the
> code in tcp_validate_incoming() and tcp_ack() may still need to
> perform the redundant checks since if some state changes are dependent
> on the sequence number or ACK number (e.g., window update).
> 
> I'm willing to help on this. Perhaps I can draft an initial patch and
> you can help take a look before I submit it?

I began coding a serie of patches.

Part of the problem comes from a 'fast path' idea that was nice 20 years
ago but no longer a real killer these days.

So some tests are duplicated, others are not correctly done.

For example, the fast path misses the more complete tests done in
tcp_ack()

Its a big mess.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html