lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:41:54 +0100
From:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:	Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	canqunzhang@...il.com, kaber@...sh.net, ebiederm@...ssion.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/19] netfilter: move nf_conntrack initialize out of
 pernet operations

Hi Gao,

On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:36:27AM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
> canqun zhang reported a panic BUG,kernel may panic when
> unloading nf_conntrack module.
> 
> It's because we reset nf_ct_destroy to NULL when we deal
> with init_net,it's too early.Some packets belongs to other
> netns still refers to the conntrack.when these packets need
> to be freed, kfree_skb will call nf_ct_destroy which is
> NULL.
> 
> fix this bug by moving the nf_conntrack initialize and cleanup
> codes out of the pernet operations,this job should be done
> in module_init/exit.We can't use init_net to identify if
> it's the right time.

First off, thanks for looking into this.

I want to get this fix into 3.8 and -stable but this patch includes a
rework whose scope is net-next (upcoming 3.9).

The attached patch aims to fix the issue according to your patch
description. Once this is in, we can revisit your code refactoring
proposal.

Let me know.

View attachment "0001-netfilter-nf_conntrack-fix-BUG_ON-while-removing-nf_.patch" of type "text/x-diff" (2759 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ