netdev - Re: [PATCH] CMAC support for CryptoAPI, fixed patch issues, indent, and testmgr build issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 24 Jan 2013 07:37:50 -0500 (EST)
From:	Tom St Denis <tstdenis@...iptictech.com>
To:	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Cc:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@...et.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CMAC support for CryptoAPI, fixed patch issues, indent,
 and testmgr build issues



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steffen Klassert" <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
> To: "Jussi Kivilinna" <jussi.kivilinna@...et.fi>
> Cc: "Herbert Xu" <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
> linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, "Tom St Denis" <tstdenis@...iptictech.com>, "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> Sent: Thursday, 24 January, 2013 7:32:10 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] CMAC support for CryptoAPI, fixed patch issues, indent, and testmgr build issues
> 
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 01:25:46PM +0200, Jussi Kivilinna wrote:
> > 
> > Maybe it would be cleaner to not mess with pfkeyv2.h at all, but
> > instead mark algorithms that do not support pfkey with flag. See
> > patch below.
> > 
> 
> Yes, would be an option too. I would be fine with that,
> but let's here if someone else has an opinion on this.
> Anyway, we need a solution to integrate Tom's patch soon.

Has anyone addressed the testmgr issues too?  I wasn't able to run the self-tests so I don't even know if the vectors were copied correctly.

Also a question for the netdev folk, in order to be timely would it be acceptable to patch ah4 and then ah6 with the AEAD changes?  Or would the team require both to be patched simultaneously?
 
Tom
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html