netdev - Re: [Web10g-user] Web10g TCP statistics patch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:57:57 -0500
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Dominic Hamon <dominic@...gle.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	web10g-user@...10g.org
Subject: Re: [Web10g-user] Web10g TCP statistics patch - mainlining into kernel?

On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:38:59 -0800, Dominic Hamon said:
> Hello Valdis
>
> I actually just finished patching a fork from the kernel github repo here:
> https://github.com/dominic-mlab/linux with a view to pushing it up. I
> haven't pushed a patch upstream before, so any guidance is welcome.

A quick browse over that git repo looks like it's unfortunately a tad
busticated - you've apparently got development on the 'master' branch, instead
of starting a separate branch.  This effectively means that it can't be easily
pulled upstream.  Fortunately, you only have one commit against it so
far, so you can probably recover by rejecting that commit so you're back
to a Linus tree, and then create a branch and do subsequent development there.

Question for the netdev people - you prefer pull requests based off
a Linus tree, or linux-next, davem/(net,net-next), or some other tree?

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped