netdev - Re: [PATCH] SCTP: Free the per-net sysctl table on net exit. v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 28 Jan 2013 22:17:09 +0100
From:	Martin Mokrejs <mmokrejs@...d.natur.cuni.cz>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, vyasevich@...il.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCTP: Free the per-net sysctl table on net exit. v2

Hi Eric,

Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Martin Mokrejs <mmokrejs@...d.natur.cuni.cz> writes:
> 
>> David Miller wrote:
>>> From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
>>> Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:25:11 -0800
>>>
>>>> The typo is fixed in the patch this time in addition to my test
>>>> tree.
>>>
>>> Applied, thanks for fixing this up Eric.
>>
>> I did check now how come that I patched my 3.7.4 on Jan 24. Looks like
>> -head or -next has different namings. For me, the original patch applied
>> fine. So far I haven't hit the memleak although it happened only once to me
>> before the patch.
> 
> The problem isn't that the patch doesn't apply the problem is that the
> patch did not build.  The naming has not changed in the git history.
> 
>> But probably I can confirm say Tested-by:.
>>
>> #
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  8435 Jan 24 17:12 /usr/src/linux-3.7.4/net/sctp/sysctl.c
>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root  8347 Jan 21 20:45 /usr/src/linux-3.7.4/net/sctp/sysctl.c.orig
>> # ls -la /usr/src/linux-3.7.4/net/sctp/sysctl.o
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 246144 Jan 21 22:37 /usr/src/linux-3.7.4/net/sctp/sysctl.o
>> # ls -la /usr/src/linux-3.7.4/arch/x86/boot/bzImage 
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3794592 Jan 21 22:45 /usr/src/linux-3.7.4/arch/x86/boot/bzImage
>> #
> 
> It doesn't look look like you rebuilt anything after you applied the
> changes to net/sctp/sysctl.c.  sysctl.o and bzImage are both 3 days older.

Ah, I must have been really blind. Thanks for pointing that out. I should
really start to do:

make bzImage && make modules && make modules_install && cp arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage /boot/vmlinuz-$ver

echo "silly me, make(1) did not delete the old bzImage"


So I haven't tested the patch yet. doh. Provided I am running 3 days without reproducing
the original memleak on an unpatched kernel I doubt I can easily prove it after a reboot.
:( Will probably stay untested. But compiles fine here. ;-)


Thanks,
Martin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html