netdev - Other alloc/OOM message question

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 08 Feb 2013 16:29:59 -0800
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Other alloc/OOM message question

On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 17:45 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 13:46:27 -0800
> > alloc failures already get standardized OOM
> > messages and a dump_stack.

Does anyone know if all the other alloc's like
dma_alloc_coherent, dma_alloc_noncoherent,
pci_alloc_consistent always produce OOM messages
via page_alloc/warn_alloc_failed for all arches?

If so, there are many more of these OOM messages
that could be removed.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html