lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 13 Feb 2013 21:09:59 +0000
From:	Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...rix.com>
To:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	Frediano Ziglio <frediano.ziglio@...rix.com>
Subject: tcp_use_frto crashes on empty tcp_write_queue


Hi,

I see the following WARN and then crash on 2.6.32.12:

<4>WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c:293 tcp_retransmit_timer+0x5dd/0x630()

...

<1>BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
<1>IP: [<c033f2b5>] tcp_use_frto+0x45/0x90
...
<0>Call Trace:
<4> [<c0343ab9>] ? tcp_retransmit_timer+0xd9/0x630
<4> [<c0120e58>] ? __wake_up_common+0x48/0x70
<4> [<c0344580>] ? tcp_write_timer+0xe0/0x1a0
<4> [<c0137fe1>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x151/0x200
<4> [<c02af069>] ? maybe_schedule_tx_action+0x39/0x40
<4> [<c03444a0>] ? tcp_write_timer+0x0/0x1a0
<4> [<c013359a>] ? __do_softirq+0xba/0x180
<4> [<c015e7a7>] ? move_native_irq+0x47/0x50
...

I've checked the code, tcp_use_frto() crashes because

skb = tcp_write_queue_head(sk);

returns a NULL, as the queue is empty, and in the next line:

if (tcp_skb_is_last(sk, skb))
===>
static inline bool tcp_skb_is_last(const struct sock *sk,
                    const struct sk_buff *skb)
{
     return skb_queue_is_last(&sk->sk_write_queue, skb);
}
===>
static inline bool skb_queue_is_last(const struct sk_buff_head *list,
                      const struct sk_buff *skb)
{
     return (skb->next == (struct sk_buff *) list);
}

That skb->next cause the NULL pointer dereference.

I've checked this in upstream, and it seems this would fail in the same 
way. Wouldn't it be more reasonable to return from 
tcp_retransmit_timer() instead of just signing a WARN? Something like this:

diff -r 7a748d2cb9f1 -r bb8257f0730a net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c    Wed Feb 13 15:02:50 2013 +0000
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c    Wed Feb 13 15:03:18 2013 +0000
@@ -287,11 +287,9 @@ void tcp_retransmit_timer(struct sock *s
      struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
      struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);

-    if (!tp->packets_out)
+    if (!tp->packets_out || tcp_write_queue_empty(sk))
          goto out;

-    WARN_ON(tcp_write_queue_empty(sk));
-
      if (!tp->snd_wnd && !sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD) &&
          !((1 << sk->sk_state) & (TCPF_SYN_SENT | TCPF_SYN_RECV))) {
          /* Receiver dastardly shrinks window. Our retransmits


Credit goes to Frediano for the patch.

Regards,

Zoli
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ