netdev - Re: [PATCHi v2] net: sh_eth: Add support of device tree probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:07:13 +0900
From:	Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@...esas.com>
To:	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	magnus.damm@...il.com, kda@...ux-powerpc.org,
	horms+renesas@...ge.net.au
Subject: Re: [PATCHi v2] net: sh_eth: Add support of device tree probe

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Kuninori Morimoto
<kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Iwamatsu-san
>
> Thank you for this patch.
>
> Small comment from me
>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> (snip)
>> +sh_eth_parse_dt(struct device *dev, struct net_device *ndev)
>> +{
>> +     int ret;
>> +     struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>> +     struct sh_eth_plat_data *pdata;
> ...
>> +#else
>> +static struct sh_eth_plat_data *
>> +sh_eth_parse_dt(struct device *dev, struct net_device *ndev)
>> +{
>> +     return NULL;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>
> (snip)
>
>>  static int sh_eth_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  {
> ...
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>> +     if (np && of_device_is_available(np)) {
>> +             pd = sh_eth_parse_dt(&pdev->dev, ndev);
>> +             if (pdev->dev.platform_data) {
>> +                     struct sh_eth_plat_data *tmp =
>> +                             pdev->dev.platform_data;
>> +                     pd->set_mdio_gate = tmp->set_mdio_gate;
>> +                     pd->needs_init = tmp->needs_init;
>> +             }
>> +     } else
>> +#endif
>
> sh_eth_parse_dt() was defined for both CO NFIG_OF and !CONFIG_OF.
> But it is called only from CONFIG_OF ?
>
Because of_device_is_available depennds CONFIG_OF.
I already send a patch which add empty fuction of of_device_is_available.
If this was applied, your point does not need.

OK, I erase empty sh_eth_parse_dt, and if a patch is applied, I will
update this.

Regards,
 Nobuhiro

-- 
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html