netdev - Re: pull request (net-next): ipsec-next 2013-02-14

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:30:45 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	steffen.klassert@...unet.com
Cc:	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull request (net-next): ipsec-next 2013-02-14

From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 12:47:20 +0100

> 1) Remove a duplicated call to skb_orphan() in pf_key, from Cong Wang.
> 
> 2) Prepare xfrm and pf_key for algorithms without pf_key support,
>    from Jussi Kivilinna.
> 
> 3) Fix an unbalanced lock in xfrm_output_one(), from Li RongQing.
> 
> 4) Add an IPsec state resolution packet queue to handle
>    packets that are send before the states are resolved.
> 
> 5) xfrm4_policy_fini() is unused since 2.6.11, time to remove it.
>    From Michal Kubecek.
> 
> 6) The xfrm gc threshold was configurable just in the initial
>    namespace, make it configurable in all namespaces. From
>    Michal Kubecek.
> 
> 7) We currently can not insert policies with mark and mask
>    such that some flows would be matched from both policies.
>    Allow this if the priorities of these policies are different,
>    the one with the higher priority is used in this case.
> 
> Please pull or let me know if there are problems.

Pulled, thanks Steffen.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html