netdev - Re: bonding inactive slaves vs rx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:47:50 +0000
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<eric.dumazet@...il.com>, <andy@...yhouse.net>
Subject: Re: bonding inactive slaves vs rx_dropped

On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 15:43 -0800, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
[...]
> >My general rule is that every special case increments a special
> >'absurdity' statistic counter for the code :-)
> 
> 	Gonna need a whole lot of those for bonding, then.  Maybe it
> should have its own ethtool -S stats to handle all of the
> bonding-internal absurdity.
[...]

Yes, I think it should.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html