Date:	Tue, 26 Feb 2013 21:27:51 -0500
From:	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
To:	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, john.r.fastabend@...el.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] core: Add ioctls to control device unicast hw addresses

On 02/26/2013 09:07 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 05:15:03PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> From: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
>> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 13:58:39 -0800
>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [RFC PATCH] rtnetlink: Add support for adding/removing additional hw
>>>>>> addresses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Add an ability to add and remove HW addresses to the device
>>>>>> unicast and multicast address lists.  Right now, we only have
>>>>>> an ioctl() to manage the multicast addresses and there is no
>>>>>> way the manage the unicast list.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a step in the right direction, and you're right that there is
>>>>> a difficulty in detecting whether support exists or not.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am so surprised that we've have ->set_rx_mode() support for multiple
>>>>> unicast MAC addresses in so many drivers all this time, yet no way
>>>>> outside of FDB to make use of it at all.
>>>>
>>>> And even that is not always available.  In most drivers it requires
>>>> module parameters or other explicit configuration steps.  Meanwhile
>>>> set_rx_mode() doesn't seem to depend on any of those and just does the
>>>> right thing.
>>>>
>>>> For what I was trying to do ioctl() was a really easy way out for both
>>>> kernel and user space implementation, so I gave is shot.
>>>>
>>>> -vlad
>>>>
>>>
>>> Don't we already support this with
>>
>> The whole point is that these multiple-unicast-address configuration
>> facilities are inaccessible without FDB, and there is no reason
>> whatsoever for that.
>
> Yes I see now sorry I was behind the thread.
>
> We could just use the fdb hooks and add a dflt routine to handle the
> case where the netdev doesn't provide a specific ndo_op for us. This
> boils down to calling set_rx_mode anyways through this call chain,
>
>     ndo_fdb_add
> 	dev_uc_add_excl
> 		__dev_set_rx_mode
> 			ndo_set_rx_mode
>
> As long as folks don't think this is too much of an abuse of the fdb
> hooks. Here's an example I only compile tested this so take it as
> an example only. It probably needs some cleanups and the dump routine
> needs some thought not sure you want to dump all MACs always.

I thought about doing, but this becomes broken on the drivers that 
support ndo_fdb_* functions.  Those drivers mainly require additional 
configuration that is not necessary for dev_uc_add_excl() to work.

For example, ixgbe and melanox requires VF to be on, qlogic needs a 
module parameter, macvlan has to be in passthrough.  However, 
ndo_set_rx_mode() in most cases doesn't care about those settings and 
just works.

So fdb will not always work even if the driver has proper support for
IFF_UNICAST_FLT.

-vlad

>
>
> [RFC PATCH] net: fdb: generic set support for drivers without ndo_op
>
> If the driver does not support the ndo_op use the generic
> handler for it. This should work in the majority of cases.
> Eventually the fdb_dflt_add call gets translated into a
> __dev_set_rx_mode() call which should handle hardware
> support for filtering via the IFF_UNICAST_FLT flag.
>
> Namely IFF_UNICAST_FLT indicates if the hardware can do
> unicast address filtering. If no support is available
> the device is put into promisc mode.
>
> It looks like we likely also need IFF_MULTICAST_FLT and
> also tighten up how drivers handle multicast filters. But
> thats another patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
> ---
>   net/core/rtnetlink.c |   80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> index d8aa20f..d1c6f71 100644
> --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> @@ -2049,6 +2049,37 @@ errout:
>   	rtnl_set_sk_err(net, RTNLGRP_NEIGH, err);
>   }
>
> +/**
> + * ndo_dflt_fdb_add - default netdevice operation to add an FDB entry
> + */
> +static int ndo_dflt_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *ndm,
> +			    struct nlattr *tb[],
> +			    struct net_device *dev,
> +			    const unsigned char *addr,
> +			    u16 flags)
> +{
> +	int err = -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* If aging addresses are supported device will need to
> +	 * implement its own handler for this.
> +	 */
> +	if (ndm->ndm_state && !(ndm->ndm_state & NUD_PERMANENT)) {
> +		pr_info("%s: FDB only supports static addresses\n", dev->name);
> +		return err;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (is_unicast_ether_addr(addr) || is_link_local_ether_addr(addr))
> +		err = dev_uc_add_excl(dev, addr);
> +	else if (is_multicast_ether_addr(addr))
> +		err = dev_mc_add_excl(dev, addr);
> +
> +	/* Only return duplicate errors if NLM_F_EXCL is set */
> +	if (err == -EEXIST && !(flags & NLM_F_EXCL))
> +		err = 0;
> +
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
>   static int rtnl_fdb_add(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, void *arg)
>   {
>   	struct net *net = sock_net(skb->sk);
> @@ -2101,10 +2132,14 @@ static int rtnl_fdb_add(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, void *arg)
>   	}
>
>   	/* Embedded bridge, macvlan, and any other device support */
> -	if ((ndm->ndm_flags & NTF_SELF) && dev->netdev_ops->ndo_fdb_add) {
> -		err = dev->netdev_ops->ndo_fdb_add(ndm, tb,
> -						   dev, addr,
> -						   nlh->nlmsg_flags);
> +	if ((ndm->ndm_flags & NTF_SELF)) {
> +		if (dev->netdev_ops->ndo_fdb_add)
> +			err = dev->netdev_ops->ndo_fdb_add(ndm, tb,
> +						   	   dev, addr,
> +						   	   nlh->nlmsg_flags);
> +		else
> +			err = ndo_dflt_fdb_add(ndm, tb, dev, addr,
> +					       nlh->nlmsg_flags);
>
>   		if (!err) {
>   			rtnl_fdb_notify(dev, addr, RTM_NEWNEIGH);
> @@ -2115,6 +2150,34 @@ out:
>   	return err;
>   }
>
> +/**
> + * ndo_dflt_fdb_del - default netdevice operation to delete an FDB entry
> + */
> +static int ndo_dflt_fdb_del(struct ndmsg *ndm,
> +			    struct nlattr *tb[],
> +			    struct net_device *dev,
> +			    const unsigned char *addr)
> +{
> +	int err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	/* If aging addresses are supported device will need to
> +	 * implement its own handler for this.
> +	 */
> +	if (ndm->ndm_state & NUD_PERMANENT) {
> +		pr_info("%s: FDB only supports static addresses\n", dev->name);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (is_unicast_ether_addr(addr))
> +		err = dev_uc_del(dev, addr);
> +	else if (is_multicast_ether_addr(addr))
> +		err = dev_mc_del(dev, addr);
> +	else
> +		err = -EINVAL;
> +
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
>   static int rtnl_fdb_del(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, void *arg)
>   {
>   	struct net *net = sock_net(skb->sk);
> @@ -2172,8 +2235,11 @@ static int rtnl_fdb_del(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, void *arg)
>   	}
>
>   	/* Embedded bridge, macvlan, and any other device support */
> -	if ((ndm->ndm_flags & NTF_SELF) && dev->netdev_ops->ndo_fdb_del) {
> -		err = dev->netdev_ops->ndo_fdb_del(ndm, tb, dev, addr);
> +	if (ndm->ndm_flags & NTF_SELF) {
> +		if (dev->netdev_ops->ndo_fdb_del)
> +			err = dev->netdev_ops->ndo_fdb_del(ndm, tb, dev, addr);
> +		else
> +			err = ndo_dflt_fdb_del(ndm, tb, dev, addr);
>
>   		if (!err) {
>   			rtnl_fdb_notify(dev, addr, RTM_DELNEIGH);
> @@ -2258,6 +2324,8 @@ static int rtnl_fdb_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
>
>   		if (dev->netdev_ops->ndo_fdb_dump)
>   			idx = dev->netdev_ops->ndo_fdb_dump(skb, cb, dev, idx);
> +		else
> +			ndo_dflt_fdb_dump(skb, cb, dev, idx);
>   	}
>   	rcu_read_unlock();
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists