lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 20:53:18 -0600 From: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com> To: Tom Tucker <tom@...ngridcomputing.com> CC: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Tom Tucker <tom@....us>, Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>, Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>, Shani Michaeli <shanim@...lanox.com>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next v3] SUNRPC: rpcrdma_register_default_external: Dynamically allocate ib_phys_buf On 03/11/2013 05:02 PM, Tom Tucker wrote: > On 3/11/13 4:25 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: <snip> >> Looks good to me; wish we could get it tested.... > > I will test it. Tim could you please send me a final version that you'd > like tested as a single message? > I'm a little confused about what you are asking. I think v3 of the patch is the final version (unless you find bugs with it). > Would someone (like Tim maybe ... hint hint) look at tearing out all > those dead registration strategies? I don't think we need or will ever > use bounce-buffers, memory windows, or mlnx fmr. The only two that are > used and tested are all-phys and FRMR (the default). > Dunno if I'll get time for that. I had a one day window where I could hack out some simple patches. Now I'm back to the usual grindstone. rtg -- Tim Gardner tim.gardner@...onical.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists