netdev - Re: [PATCH] Rate should be u64 to avoid integer overflow at high speeds (>= ~35Gbit)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:57:42 -0600
From:	Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@...band.com>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
CC:	Bill Fink <billfink@...dspring.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, Vimal <j.vimal@...il.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, shemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Rate should be u64 to avoid integer overflow at high
 speeds (>= ~35Gbit)

On 03/13/2013 09:34 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:

> As others have said the multiplier shift approach is a not a workable
> solution because it is likely to cause too many compatibility surprises.
> Older kernels would ignore the multiplier and therefore not give the users
> the effective rate they wanted.

How is that any different than ignoring the 64-bit value and not giving 
the effective rate they wanted?

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html