netdev - Re: igb_poll - device driver failed to check map error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:07:30 -0700
From:	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
To:	christoph.paasch@...ouvain.be
CC:	Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
	Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: igb_poll - device driver failed to check map error

On 03/15/2013 12:52 AM, Christoph Paasch wrote:
> On Thursday 14 March 2013 19:18:18 Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> On 03/12/2013 02:31 AM, Christoph Paasch wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm seeing a warning while booting my machine when DMA_API_DEBUG is set:
>>>
>>> [   36.402824] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>> [   36.458070] WARNING: at
>>> /home/cpaasch/builder/net-next/lib/dma-debug.c:934
>>> check_unmap+0x648/0x702()
>>> [   36.567377] Hardware name: ProLiant DL165 G7
>>> [   36.618452] igb 0000:04:00.0: DMA-API: device driver failed to check
>>> map
>>> error[device address=0x0000000233d9b232] [size=154 bytes] [mapped as
>>> single] [   36.776640] Modules linked in:
>>> [   36.815446] Pid: 0, comm: swapper/7 Not tainted 3.9.0-rc1-mptcp+ #101
>>> [   36.892515] Call Trace:
>>> [   36.921745]  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff8102ad7f>] warn_slowpath_common+0x80/0x9a
>>> [   37.001023]  [<ffffffff8102ae2d>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x41/0x43
>>> [   37.069771]  [<ffffffff811db17f>] check_unmap+0x648/0x702
>>> [   37.134363]  [<ffffffff811db3e9>] debug_dma_unmap_page+0x50/0x52
>>> [   37.206234]  [<ffffffff8136676a>] igb_poll+0x144/0xf7c
>>> [   37.267706]  [<ffffffff8104dd19>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x46/0xd1
>>> [   37.336456]  [<ffffffff814458ce>] net_rx_action+0xa7/0x1d0
>>> [   37.402085]  [<ffffffff81030b65>] __do_softirq+0xb4/0x16f
>>> [   37.466673]  [<ffffffff81030c90>] irq_exit+0x40/0x87
>>> [   37.526067]  [<ffffffff81002db1>] do_IRQ+0x98/0xaf
>>> [   37.583378]  [<ffffffff815210aa>] common_interrupt+0x6a/0x6a
>>> [   37.651086]  <EOI>  [<ffffffff8105d4be>] ?
>>> __tick_nohz_idle_enter+0x116/0x31f
>>> [   37.736595]  [<ffffffff81008a04>] ? default_idle+0x24/0x39
>>> [   37.802224]  [<ffffffff81008c62>] cpu_idle+0x68/0xa4
>>> [   37.861616]  [<ffffffff81519f78>] start_secondary+0x1a9/0x1ad
>>> [   37.930364] ---[ end trace 01b5bb0fd75a464c ]---
>>>
>>>
>>> It happens shortly after mounting the NFS-root filesystem.
>>>
>>> I tried to understand what is going on, but I am now at my wit's end.
>>>
>>> By adding some print-statements, here is what I found out (not sure if
>>> this is anyhow helpful):
>>>
>>> The difference between tx_buffer->time_stamp and the current 'jiffies' is
>>> up to 2000 jiffies (HZ==1000) at the first time the above warning happens
>>> (this seems too much for me). From then on, I see my print 3-4 times
>>> appear but without such a big difference between the timestamps
>>> (difference around 1 and 2 jiffies).
>>>
>>> Some other stuff, I printed:
>>> tx_buffer->skb: ffff880235054c80
>>> tx_buffer->bytecount: 154
>>> tx_buffer->gso_segs: 1
>>> tx_buffer->protocol: 8
>>> tx_buffer->tx_flags 0x20
>>>
>>>
>>> One last thing:
>>> Am I right that after each call to dma_map_single/page a call to
>>> dma_mapping_error is needed? If that's the case, I have some patches that
>>> add this statement at missing places in the e1000, e1000e and ixgb
>>> driver. But these patches do not fix my above problem.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for your help,
>>> Christoph
>> Christoph,
>>
>> One thing that might be useful would be to reproduce this with a
>> standard 3.9-rc kernel instead of one using the multipath TCP patches.
>> This will help us to verify that the issue is reproducible with a stock
>> kernel and is not related to any ongoing work you may have only in your
>> tree.
> Hello,
>
> this is on a clean net-next kernel without any MPTCP-code.
>
> I bisected it down to  787314c35fbb (Merge tag 'iommu-updates-v3.8' of 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/joro/iommu), which simply 
> introduces the debug_dma_mapping_error-checks.
>
> Am I right with the missing calls to dma_mapping_error in e1000, e1000e and 
> ixgb?
>
> Cheers,
> Christoph
>

Christoph,

I wasn't able to see any missing calls in e1000, however I did see one
in e1000e, and possibly another in the ixgb paths.  If you already have
patches please submit them.  It is much easier to verify the issues you
found if we know what exactly it is you found.

Thanks,

Alex

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html