netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: kirkwood: add device node entries for the gigabit interfaces

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 29 Mar 2013 19:51:53 +0100
From:	Florian Fainelli <florian@...nwrt.org>
To:	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
CC:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com, jm@...tin.co.uk,
	moinejf@...e.fr, sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com,
	buytenh@...tstofly.org, andrew@...n.ch, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
	rob.herring@...xeda.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: kirkwood: add device node entries for the gigabit
 interfaces

Le 03/29/13 19:48, Jason Cooper a écrit :
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 07:14:37PM +0100, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> This patch modifies kirkwood.dtsi to specify the various gigabit
>> interfaces nodes available on kirkwood devices. They are disabled by
>> default and should be enabled on a per-board basis. egiga0 and egiga1
>> aliases are defined for convenience. The mdio node is also present and
>> should be enabled on a per-board basis as well.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <florian@...nwrt.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/kirkwood.dtsi |   46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/common.c |    4 ++--
>>   2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
> ...
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/common.c
>> index 49792a0..a606f9f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/common.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/common.c
>> @@ -251,8 +251,8 @@ void __init kirkwood_clk_init(void)
>>   	/* clkdev entries, mapping clks to devices */
>>   	orion_clkdev_add(NULL, "orion_spi.0", runit);
>>   	orion_clkdev_add(NULL, "orion_spi.1", runit);
>> -	orion_clkdev_add(NULL, MV643XX_ETH_NAME ".0", ge0);
>> -	orion_clkdev_add(NULL, MV643XX_ETH_NAME ".1", ge1);
>> +	orion_clkdev_add("0", MV643XX_ETH_NAME ".0", ge0);
>> +	orion_clkdev_add("1", MV643XX_ETH_NAME ".1", ge1);
>
> Your first patch is going to go through David's tree, and I'd like to
> prevent any hard dependency between his tree and arm-soc.  Can this
> change be pulled out and applied separately?  At first glance, it looks
> like a fix to match sata and pcie.

I just actually did the same thing as what SATA has (two clocks with 
names), define a clock name "0" and "1" (is not that too generic BTW?) 
for ge0 and ge1. But I don't think this change is required.
--
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html