netdev - Re: [Patch net-next] vxlan: revert "vxlan: Bypass encapsulation if the destination is local"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:53:35 -0700
From:	Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>
To:	Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next] vxlan: revert "vxlan: Bypass encapsulation if
 the destination is local"

On 4/10/2013 7:10 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
>> - when source and destination endpoints belonging to different vni's
>>    are on 2 different bridges on the same host. encap bypass is done
>>    in this scenario by checking if rt_flags has RTCF_LOCAL set. I think
>>    you must be hitting this path and the following patch should fix
>>    it by only doing bypass if the source and dest devices belong to
>>    the same net. Can you try it and see if it fixes your tests?
> I just tested it, unfortunately it doesn't work, the bug still exists.
>
> If you need any other info, please let me know.
So does it mean that you are hitting the if condition that does encap 
bypass
even afterthe net_eq() check? Do the tests pass If you comment out the 
'if' block?

Can you share your test config/scripts so that i can try out your setup if
it is not toocomplicated?

Thanks
Sridhar


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html