netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: fec: Enable imx6 enet checksum acceleration.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 16 Apr 2013 23:16:22 +0100
From:	Jim Baxter <jim_baxter@...tor.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: fec: Enable imx6 enet checksum acceleration.

On 16/04/13 19:00, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jim Baxter <jim_baxter@...tor.com>
> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 14:09:25 +0000 (UTC)
> 
>> David Miller <davem <at> davemloft.net> writes:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> When you post multiple versions of a patch, always say what is different
>>> between the versions.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Sorry, I was trying to differentiate between my first two messed up posts and 
>> the correct patch post. I first forgot to mark it net-net and then I managed 
>> to send it from y@...ay1.mentorg.com.
>>
>> Is there a better way to correct incorrect patch headers?
> 
> You post it again, but you say what you changed so that we know what
> is happening.
> 
> You put such change annotations after the "---" seperator so that they
> do not appear in the final commit message.
> 

OK, Thank you for your help.

Jim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html