netdev - Re: [PATCH 5/5] ks8851: Remove unneeded PM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:37:50 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	lars@...afoo.de
Cc:	fabio.estevam@...escale.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	joe@...ches.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ks8851: Remove unneeded PM_OPS definitions

From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 22:29:37 +0200

> On 04/16/2013 09:28 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>> SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS macro can handle !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP case nicely, so there is no
>> need to define PM_OPS for both CONFIG_PM_SLEEP and !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP cases.
>> 
>> Remove the unneeded definitions.
>> 
>> Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>
> 
> yea, but now you have the dev_pm_ops struct, even if pm is disabled.

That's fine, it allows the functions to be compile tested in all
configurations.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html