netdev - linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the infiniband tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:18:43 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
	Vipul Pandya <vipul@...lsio.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the infiniband
 tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in
drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/qp.c between commit 5b0c275926b8
("RDMA/cxgb4: Fix SQ allocation when on-chip SQ is disabled") from the
infiniband tree and commit 9919d5bd01b9 ("RDMA/cxgb4: Fix onchip queue
support for T5") from the net-next tree.

I think that they are 2 different fixes for the same problem, so I just
used the net-next version and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped