netdev - Re: [PATCH] rps: selective flow shedding during softnet overflow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 19 Apr 2013 12:03:03 -0700
From:	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rps: selective flow shedding during softnet overflow

On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 13:46:52 -0400
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com> wrote:

> A cpu executing the network receive path sheds packets when its input
> queue grows to netdev_max_backlog. A single high rate flow (such as a
> spoofed source DoS) can exceed a single cpu processing rate and will
> degrade throughput of other flows hashed onto the same cpu.
> 
> This patch adds a more fine grained hashtable. If the netdev backlog
> is above a threshold, IRQ cpus track the ratio of total traffic of
> each flow (using 1024 buckets, configurable). The ratio is measured
> by counting the number of packets per flow over the last 256 packets
> from the source cpu. Any flow that occupies a large fraction of this
> (set at 50%) will see packet drop while above the threshold.
> 
> Tested:
> Setup is a muli-threaded UDP echo server with network rx IRQ on cpu0,
> kernel receive (RPS) on cpu0 and application threads on cpus 2--7
> each handling 20k req/s. Throughput halves when hit with a 400 kpps
> antagonist storm. With this patch applied, antagonist overload is
> dropped and the server processes its complete load.
> 
> The patch is effective when kernel receive processing is the
> bottleneck. The above RPS scenario is a extreme, but the same is
> reached with RFS and sufficient kernel processing (iptables, packet
> socket tap, ..).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>

The netdev_backlog only applies for RPS and non-NAPI devices.
So this won't help if receive packet steering is not enabled.
Seems like a deficiency in the receive steering design rather
than the netdev_backlog.

Can't you do this with existing ingress stuff?
The trend seems to be put in more fixed infrastructure to deal with
performance and server problems rather than building general purpose
solutions.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html