netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/3] ARM: net: bpf_jit_32: support BPF_S_ANC_SECCOMP_LD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 29 Apr 2013 12:16:31 +0200
From:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
To:	Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	David Laight <david.laight@...lab.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@...ebox.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/3] ARM: net: bpf_jit_32: support BPF_S_ANC_SECCOMP_LD_W
 instruction

On 04/27/2013 08:32 PM, Xi Wang wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com> wrote:

>> Besides all that, I think I also pointed you to a patch that already made
>> it in for ARM, not sure why you keep posting the ARM JIT implementation?
>
> That's why I asked in the other post if you wanted me to rebase
> against linux-next or net-next.  The ARM part 3/3 is not needed if
> rebased against linux-next with Nicolas's patches.

This discussion was only in terms of the unified interface, not the seccomp
JIT itself. If you speak about ``patch'' (and not ``patch set'') I assumed
you were only referring to the first one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html