lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:19:28 +0530
From:	Vipul Pandya <vipul@...lsio.com>
To:	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	Vipul Pandya <vipul@...lsio.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Divy Le Ray <divy@...lsio.com>,
	Dimitrios Michailidis <dm@...lsio.com>,
	Abhishek Agrawal <abhishek@...lsio.com>,
	Casey Leedom <leedom@...lsio.com>,
	SWise OGC <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/3] Bug fixes for cxgb4 and cxgb4vf



On 29-04-2013 19:34, Vipul Pandya wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> This patch series does the following:
> 1. Passes correct PF number during initialization of pci_device_id structure
> 2. Adds code in cxgb4 and cxgb4vf driver to handle CPL_SGE_EGR_UPDATE message
>    encapsulated in a CPL_FW4_MSG.
> 
> We would like to request this patch series to get merged via David Miller's
> 'net' tree.
> 
> Thanks,
> Vipul
> 
> Vipul Pandya (3):
>   cxgb4: Fix pci_device_id structure initialization with correct PF
>     number
>   cxgb4: Support CPL_SGE_EGR_UPDATEs encapsulated in a CPL_FW4_MSG
>   cxgb4vf: Support CPL_SGE_EGR_UPDATEs encapsulated in a CPL_FW4_MSG
> 
>  drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_main.c    | 107 +++++++++++++--------
>  drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/t4_msg.h        |  11 +++
>  drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/t4fw_api.h      |  38 +++++++-
>  .../net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4vf/cxgb4vf_main.c    |  25 +++++
>  4 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> 

Hi David Miller,

I have forgotten to check if 'net' and 'net-next' tree are in sync or
not. I am sorry for that. This patch series is built against net-next
tree. Since these are bug fixes we wanted to merge it via 'net' tree.
However now I see that required patches are missing in 'net' tree. To be
able to successfully apply this patch series in 'net' tree we need
patches from commit 47ce9c482 (cxgb4: Allow for backward compatibility
with new VPD scheme.) into 'net' tree. If it is not possible to apply
those patches into 'net' tree then please apply this patch series
against 'net-next'. Please let me know if I have to resend the series.

Thanks,
Vipul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ