netdev - Re: [PATCH v3b 1/3] tipc: cosmetic: clean up comments and break a long line

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 01 May 2013 13:16:02 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	gerlando.falauto@...mile.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com,
	jon.maloy@...csson.com, erik.hugne@...csson.com,
	ying.xue@...driver.com, holger.brunck@...mile.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3b 1/3] tipc: cosmetic: clean up comments and break a
 long line

From: Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.falauto@...mile.com>
Date: Wed,  1 May 2013 18:41:17 +0200

> Signed-off-by: Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.falauto@...mile.com>
> ---
> Changes from v3:
> * Added "and break a long line" to the commit message
> Changes from v2:
> * Split cosmetic (this patch) from functional changes (next patch)

Never resubmit patches by themselves, always resubmit the entire series.

Because when one patch has problems, I toss the entire series from patchwork,
and by resubmitting the entire series again you are also giving me important
information, you're telling me that the subsequent patches in the series
still apply cleanly even though the first one has changed.

I've tossed this patch too, resubmit this properly, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html