lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 09:51:00 +0800 From: Frank Li <lznuaa@...il.com> To: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de> Cc: Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@...gutronix.de>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "Frank.Li@...escale.com" <Frank.Li@...escale.com>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH resend 1/3] Revert "net: fec: fix missing napi_disable call" 2013/4/29 Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>: > What is the exact situation which caused a > deadlock here? I tried to see what's happening from your changelogs, but > I'm not sure I can follow here. Wasn't the problem more of the used > spinlocks not being IRQ-save and thus potentially creating a deadlock? You can view below email thread. http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg225240.html The main problem network API use spin_lock_bh only now. So it does not prefer use irq to handle skb process. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists