lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 18:05:17 -0400 From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...omium.org>, Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, linux-nfs <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>, Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Ben Chan <benchan@...omium.org>, Steve French <smfrench@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] freezer: add unsafe versions of freezable helpers On Mon, 6 May 2013 14:58:31 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com> wrote: > >> > >> There are many other possibilities for other codepaths that end up in > >> wait_for_response(). Once we get a solution in place for NFS, we'll > >> need to do something very similar for CIFS. > > > > Makes sense, I will add CIFS to the patch. Would you prefer it in the > > same or separate patches. > > Quite frankly, is it worth resurrecting these patches at all? > > The only things it actually complained about are not worth the pain > fixing and are getting explicitly not warned about - is there any > reason to believe the patches are worth maintaining and the extra > complexity is worth it? > > Linus Well, these problems are worth the pain of fixing, I think. It's just going to take us a while to get there since it involves some significant surgery. As to whether the warnings themselves are worthwhile now that we're excluding the most egregious offenders from them, I don't much care either way. -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists