netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] sh_eth: add support for r8a7790 SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 13 May 2013 09:37:34 +0900
From:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Cc:	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	SH-Linux <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] sh_eth: add support for r8a7790 SoC

On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 03:10:55PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On 10-05-2013 12:35, Magnus Damm wrote:
> 
> >>Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
> >>Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>
> >>---
> >>  drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/Kconfig  |  2 +-
> >>  drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/sh_eth.c | 10 ++++++++--
> >>  drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/sh_eth.h |  1 +
> >>  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> >Thanks for your work on this driver.
> 
> >>diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/Kconfig b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/Kconfig
> >>index bed9841..d664c0f 100644
> >>--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/Kconfig
> >>+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/Kconfig
> >>@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ config SH_ETH
> >>                  CPU_SUBTYPE_SH7763 || CPU_SUBTYPE_SH7619 || \
> >>                  CPU_SUBTYPE_SH7724 || CPU_SUBTYPE_SH7734 || \
> >>                  CPU_SUBTYPE_SH7757 || ARCH_R8A7740 || \
> >>-                ARCH_R8A7778 || ARCH_R8A7779)
> >>+                ARCH_R8A7778 || ARCH_R8A7779 || ARCH_R8A7790)
> 
> >As much as I want to see R8A7790 support right away, wouldn't it be
> >nice _not_ to have this dependency crap in the Kconfig? We are already
> >multi-SoC within mach-shmobile ARM and soon we will be multi-subarch.
> 
> >I actually thought that this was already taken care of. What is your
> >opinion? Perhaps there are already queued up cleanup patches that
> >handle this?
> 
>     No, AFAIK. I haven't gotten around to the big cleanups yet.

I think it is worth extending the coverage of the driver in parallel
to any clean-ups that are going on.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html