netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/5] drivers: net: usb: rtl8150: bug fixing and cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 20 May 2013 10:18:17 +0300 (EEST)
From:	Petko Manolov <petkan@...leusys.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc:	romieu@...zoreil.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] drivers: net: usb: rtl8150: bug fixing and cleanup

On Mon, 20 May 2013, David Miller wrote:

> From: Petko Manolov <petkan@...leusys.com>
> Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 10:09:00 +0300 (EEST)
> 
> > What about the .c/.h split?
> 
> I have no strong opinion either way.

OK, so i'll prepare new patch series that coalesce my original patch #1 
and #2, and apply the Francois suggestion about using the generic 
netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align() in the interrupt path.

Which tree would you want me to diff against?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html