| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 11:28:57 +0200
From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To: hannes@...essinduktion.org
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
petrus.lt@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] ipv6: fix route selection if kernel is not compiled
with CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF
Le 10/07/2013 09:54, Nicolas Dichtel a écrit :
> Le 09/07/2013 23:57, Hannes Frederic Sowa a écrit :
>> Hello Nicolas!
>>
>> I am currently trying to fix the nexthop selection for kernels compiled
>> without support for CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF. I attached my current patch
>> below. While testing I got the following kernel panic in ecmp code:
>>
>> [ 80.144667] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> [ 80.145172] kernel BUG at net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:733!
>> [ 80.145172] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
>> [ 80.145172] Modules linked in: 8021q nf_conntrack_netbios_ns
>> nf_conntrack_broadcast ipt_MASQUERADE ip6table_mangle ip6t_REJECT
>> nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 iptable_nat nf_nat_ipv4 nf_nat iptable_mangle
>> nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 xt_conntrack nf_conntrack ebtable_filter
>> ebtables ip6table_filter ip6_tables snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep
>> snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_pcm snd_page_alloc snd_timer virtio_balloon snd
>> soundcore i2c_piix4 i2c_core virtio_net virtio_blk
>> [ 80.145172] CPU: 1 PID: 786 Comm: ping6 Not tainted 3.10.0+ #118
>> [ 80.145172] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
>> [ 80.145172] task: ffff880117fa0000 ti: ffff880118770000 task.ti:
>> ffff880118770000
>> [ 80.145172] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff815f3b5d>] [<ffffffff815f3b5d>]
>> fib6_add+0x75d/0x830
>> [ 80.145172] RSP: 0018:ffff880118771798 EFLAGS: 00010202
>> [ 80.145172] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88011350e480
>> [ 80.145172] RDX: ffff88011350e238 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff88011350f738
>> [ 80.145172] RBP: ffff880118771848 R08: ffff880117903280 R09: 0000000000000001
>> [ 80.145172] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88011350f680
>> [ 80.145172] R13: ffff880117903280 R14: ffff880118771890 R15: ffff88011350ef90
>> [ 80.145172] FS: 00007f02b5127740(0000) GS:ffff88011fd00000(0000)
>> knlGS:0000000000000000
>> [ 80.145172] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
>> [ 80.145172] CR2: 00007f981322a000 CR3: 00000001181b1000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
>> [ 80.145172] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>> [ 80.145172] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
>> [ 80.145172] Stack:
>> [ 80.145172] 0000000000000001 ffff880100000000 ffff880100000000
>> ffff880117903280
>> [ 80.145172] 0000000000000000 ffff880119a4cf00 0000000000000400
>> 00000000000007fa
>> [ 80.145172] 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
>> ffff88011350f680
>> [ 80.145172] Call Trace:
>> [ 80.145172] [<ffffffff815eeceb>] ? rt6_bind_peer+0x4b/0x90
>> [ 80.145172] [<ffffffff815ed985>] __ip6_ins_rt+0x45/0x70
>> [ 80.145172] [<ffffffff815eee35>] ip6_ins_rt+0x35/0x40
>> [ 80.145172] [<ffffffff815ef1e4>] ip6_pol_route.isra.44+0x3a4/0x4b0
>> [ 80.145172] [<ffffffff815ef34a>] ip6_pol_route_output+0x2a/0x30
>> [ 80.145172] [<ffffffff81616077>] fib6_rule_action+0xd7/0x210
>> [ 80.145172] [<ffffffff815ef320>] ? ip6_pol_route_input+0x30/0x30
>> [ 80.145172] [<ffffffff81553026>] fib_rules_lookup+0xc6/0x140
>> [ 80.145172] [<ffffffff81616374>] fib6_rule_lookup+0x44/0x80
>> [ 80.145172] [<ffffffff815ef320>] ? ip6_pol_route_input+0x30/0x30
>> [ 80.145172] [<ffffffff815edea3>] ip6_route_output+0x73/0xb0
>> [ 80.145172] [<ffffffff815dfdf3>] ip6_dst_lookup_tail+0x2c3/0x2e0
>> [ 80.145172] [<ffffffff813007b1>] ? list_del+0x11/0x40
>> [ 80.145172] [<ffffffff81082a4c>] ? remove_wait_queue+0x3c/0x50
>> [ 80.145172] [<ffffffff815dfe4d>] ip6_dst_lookup_flow+0x3d/0xa0
>> [ 80.145172] [<ffffffff815fda77>] rawv6_sendmsg+0x267/0xc20
>> [ 80.145172] [<ffffffff815a8a83>] inet_sendmsg+0x63/0xb0
>> [ 80.145172] [<ffffffff8128eb93>] ? selinux_socket_sendmsg+0x23/0x30
>> [ 80.145172] [<ffffffff815218d6>] sock_sendmsg+0xa6/0xd0
>> [ 80.145172] [<ffffffff81524a68>] SYSC_sendto+0x128/0x180
>> [ 80.145172] [<ffffffff8109825c>] ? update_curr+0xec/0x170
>> [ 80.145172] [<ffffffff81041d09>] ? kvm_clock_get_cycles+0x9/0x10
>> [ 80.145172] [<ffffffff810afd1e>] ? __getnstimeofday+0x3e/0xd0
>> [ 80.145172] [<ffffffff8152509e>] SyS_sendto+0xe/0x10
>> [ 80.145172] [<ffffffff8164efd9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>> [ 80.145172] Code: fe ff ff 41 f6 45 2a 06 0f 85 ca fe ff ff 49 8b 7e 08 4c
>> 89 ee e8 94 ef ff ff e9 b9 fe ff ff 48 8b 82 28 05 00 00 e9 01 ff ff ff <0f>
>> 0b 49 8b 54 24 30 0d 00 00 40 00 89 83 14 01 00 00 48 89 53
>> [ 80.145172] RIP [<ffffffff815f3b5d>] fib6_add+0x75d/0x830
>> [ 80.145172] RSP <ffff880118771798>
>> [ 80.387413] ---[ end trace 02f20b7a8b81ed95 ]---
>> [ 80.390154] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
>>
>> The relevant code is:
>>
>> 725 /* For each sibling in the list, increment the
>> counter of
>> 726 * siblings. BUG() if counters does not match, list
>> of siblings
>> 727 * is broken!
>> 728 */
>> 729 rt6i_nsiblings = 0;
>> 730 list_for_each_entry_safe(sibling, temp_sibling,
>> 731 &rt->rt6i_siblings,
>> rt6i_siblings) {
>> 732 sibling->rt6i_nsiblings++;
>> 733 BUG_ON(sibling->rt6i_nsiblings !=
>> rt->rt6i_nsiblings);
>> 734 rt6i_nsiblings++;
>> 735 }
>> 736 BUG_ON(rt6i_nsiblings != rt->rt6i_nsiblings);
>> 737 }
>>
>> Currently, I don't know if I my patch is to blame or something in the ecmp logic.
>>
>> Another thing I just noticed is:
>>
>> 1240 /* Remove this entry from other siblings */
>> 1241 if (rt->rt6i_nsiblings) {
>> 1242 struct rt6_info *sibling, *next_sibling;
>> 1243
>> 1244 list_for_each_entry_safe(sibling, next_sibling,
>> 1245 &rt->rt6i_siblings,
>> rt6i_siblings)
>> 1246 sibling->rt6i_nsiblings--;
>> 1247 rt->rt6i_nsiblings = 0;
>> 1248 list_del_init(&rt->rt6i_siblings);
>> 1249 }
>>
>> Are we sure we decrement all sibling's rt6i_nsiblings? Shouldn't we
>> start iterating from fn->leaf? But this does not seem to cause it,
>> because my trace does not report any calls to fib6_del_route.
> Note sure to follow you, but all siblings are listed in rt6i_siblings, so it
> must be enough.
>
>>
>> You could try reproduce it by having an interface autoconfigured with
>> a default router with NUD_VALID neighbour. I then added an unused vlan
>> interface (vid 100 in my case) and added the following ip addresses:
>>
>> ip -6 a a 2001:ffff::1/64 dev eth0.100
>> ip -6 r a 2000::/3 nexthop via 2001:ffff::30 nexthop via 2001:ffff::31 nexthop
>> via 2001:ffff::32 nexthop via 2001:ffff::33
>>
>> (all nexthops should not be reachable)
>>
>> After starting a ping6 2000::1 the box should panic soon, after the
>> first nexthop entry times out.
>>
>> Perhaps you could give me a hint?
> I will run some tests with your patch. Will see.
I don't reproduce this panic.
Maybe you can try to revert this patch:
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/net/ipv6/route.c?id=52bd4c0c1551daa2efa7bb9e01a2f4ea6d1311bb
Regards,
Nicolas
>
> I assume you didn't reproduce this without your patch.
>
>
> Regards,
> Nicolas
>
>>
>> Thanks a lot,
>>
>> Hannes
>>
>>
>> [PATCH RFC] ipv6: fix route selection if kernel not compiled with
>> CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF
>>
>> This is a follow-up patch to 3630d40067a21d4dfbadc6002bb469ce26ac5d52
>> ("ipv6: rt6_check_neigh should successfully verify neigh if no NUD
>> information are available").
>>
>> Since the removal of rt->n in rt6_info we can end up with a dst ==
>> NULL in rt6_check_neigh. In case the kernel is not compiled with
>> CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF we should also select a route with unkown
>> NUD state but we must not avoid doing round robin selection on routes
>> with the same target. So introduce and pass down a boolean ``do_rr'' to
>> indicate when we should update rt->rr_ptr. As soon as no route is valid
>> we do backtracking and do a lookup on a higher level in the fib trie.
>>
>> To hold correct state on the NUD selection we need to create a neighbour
>> entry as soon as we tried to validate a nexthop.
>>
>> I changed the return value of rt6_check_neigh to:
>> 1 in case of the dst entry validated
>> -1 in case of we had no dst_entry and we need to do rr now
>> -2 in case a we had a dst_entry and it did not validate
>>
>> In case of CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF, rt6_probe does not allocate an
>> neighbour entry (!CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF: rt6_probe is a nop). Because
>> of this, we have to create a neighbour entry on nexthop validation to
>> track earlier validation errors. We recheck NUD state here to shortcurcuit
>> NUD_NOARP neighbours.
>>
>> This seems to be the least complex fix for stable and net. I'll introduce
>> a new route lookup flag 'idempotent' as soon as next opens to not let
>> ip route get trigger active NUD validation if CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF
>> is enabled. Currently we trigger active NUD validation if compiled with
>> CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF.
>>
>> It also seems advantageous to make CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF a runtime
>> switch and just select the default operation on compile-time.
>>
>> v2:
>> a) improved rt6_check_neigh logic and documented return values
>>
>> Reported-by: Pierre Emeriaud <petrus.lt@...il.com>
>> Cc: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
>> ---
>> net/ipv6/route.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
>> index bd5fd70..c5d9e68 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
>> @@ -531,28 +531,34 @@ static inline int rt6_check_dev(struct rt6_info *rt, int
>> oif)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static inline bool rt6_check_neigh(struct rt6_info *rt)
>> +/* This function checks if a neighbour is reachable for routing
>> + * purposes. It returns -2 in case the neighbour should not get
>> + * selected as a viable router, -1 in case it should get selected with
>> + * lowest score and afterwards trying roundrobin. 1 indicates a
>> + * successfull verification.
>> + */
>> +static inline int rt6_check_neigh(struct rt6_info *rt)
>> {
>> struct neighbour *neigh;
>> - bool ret = false;
>> + int ret = -2;
>>
>> if (rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_NONEXTHOP ||
>> !(rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_GATEWAY))
>> - return true;
>> + return 1;
>>
>> rcu_read_lock_bh();
>> neigh = __ipv6_neigh_lookup_noref(rt->dst.dev, &rt->rt6i_gateway);
>> if (neigh) {
>> read_lock(&neigh->lock);
>> if (neigh->nud_state & NUD_VALID)
>> - ret = true;
>> + ret = 1;
>> #ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF
>> else if (!(neigh->nud_state & NUD_FAILED))
>> - ret = true;
>> + ret = 1;
>> #endif
>> read_unlock(&neigh->lock);
>> - } else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF)) {
>> - ret = true;
>> + } else {
>> + ret = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF) ? 1 : -1;
>> }
>> rcu_read_unlock_bh();
>>
>> @@ -566,43 +572,52 @@ static int rt6_score_route(struct rt6_info *rt, int oif,
>>
>> m = rt6_check_dev(rt, oif);
>> if (!m && (strict & RT6_LOOKUP_F_IFACE))
>> - return -1;
>> + return -2;
>> #ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF
>> m |= IPV6_DECODE_PREF(IPV6_EXTRACT_PREF(rt->rt6i_flags)) << 2;
>> #endif
>> - if (!rt6_check_neigh(rt) && (strict & RT6_LOOKUP_F_REACHABLE))
>> - return -1;
>> + if (strict & RT6_LOOKUP_F_REACHABLE) {
>> + int n = rt6_check_neigh(rt);
>> + if (n < 0)
>> + return n;
>> + }
>> return m;
>> }
>>
>> static struct rt6_info *find_match(struct rt6_info *rt, int oif, int strict,
>> - int *mpri, struct rt6_info *match)
>> + int *mpri, struct rt6_info *match,
>> + bool *do_rr)
>> {
>> int m;
>> + bool match_do_rr = false;
>>
>> if (rt6_check_expired(rt))
>> goto out;
>>
>> m = rt6_score_route(rt, oif, strict);
>> - if (m < 0)
>> + if (m == -1 && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF)) {
>> + match_do_rr = true;
>> + m = 0; /* lowest valid score */
>> + } else if (m < 0) {
>> goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (strict & RT6_LOOKUP_F_REACHABLE)
>> + rt6_probe(rt);
>>
>> if (m > *mpri) {
>> - if (strict & RT6_LOOKUP_F_REACHABLE)
>> - rt6_probe(match);
>> + *do_rr = match_do_rr;
>> *mpri = m;
>> match = rt;
>> - } else if (strict & RT6_LOOKUP_F_REACHABLE) {
>> - rt6_probe(rt);
>> }
>> -
>> out:
>> return match;
>> }
>>
>> static struct rt6_info *find_rr_leaf(struct fib6_node *fn,
>> struct rt6_info *rr_head,
>> - u32 metric, int oif, int strict)
>> + u32 metric, int oif, int strict,
>> + bool *do_rr)
>> {
>> struct rt6_info *rt, *match;
>> int mpri = -1;
>> @@ -610,10 +625,10 @@ static struct rt6_info *find_rr_leaf(struct fib6_node *fn,
>> match = NULL;
>> for (rt = rr_head; rt && rt->rt6i_metric == metric;
>> rt = rt->dst.rt6_next)
>> - match = find_match(rt, oif, strict, &mpri, match);
>> + match = find_match(rt, oif, strict, &mpri, match, do_rr);
>> for (rt = fn->leaf; rt && rt != rr_head && rt->rt6i_metric == metric;
>> rt = rt->dst.rt6_next)
>> - match = find_match(rt, oif, strict, &mpri, match);
>> + match = find_match(rt, oif, strict, &mpri, match, do_rr);
>>
>> return match;
>> }
>> @@ -622,15 +637,16 @@ static struct rt6_info *rt6_select(struct fib6_node *fn,
>> int oif, int strict)
>> {
>> struct rt6_info *match, *rt0;
>> struct net *net;
>> + bool do_rr = false;
>>
>> rt0 = fn->rr_ptr;
>> if (!rt0)
>> fn->rr_ptr = rt0 = fn->leaf;
>>
>> - match = find_rr_leaf(fn, rt0, rt0->rt6i_metric, oif, strict);
>> + match = find_rr_leaf(fn, rt0, rt0->rt6i_metric, oif, strict,
>> + &do_rr);
>>
>> - if (!match &&
>> - (strict & RT6_LOOKUP_F_REACHABLE)) {
>> + if (do_rr) {
>> struct rt6_info *next = rt0->dst.rt6_next;
>>
>> /* no entries matched; do round-robin */
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists