netdev - Re: [RFC] Any value in having a netdev FAQ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:42:35 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Any value in having a netdev FAQ?

On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 22:59 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> Q: Any other tips to help ensure my net/net-next patch gets OK'd?
> 
> A: Attention to detail.  You can start with checkpatch.pl, but do not
>    be mindlessly robotic in doing so.

Suggest checkpatch.pl --strict because there are some
style elements (like multi-line statement alignment)
where checkpatch bleats with --strict that are commonly
used in net and drivers/net. 

email the proposed patch to yourself and make sure it
applies cleanly before sending it to the netdev mailing
list.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html