netdev - Re: [RFC] Any value in having a netdev FAQ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Jul 2013 14:21:00 -0400
From:	Benjamin Poirier <benjamin.poirier@...il.com>
To:	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Cc:	Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Any value in having a netdev FAQ?

On 2013/07/17 11:18, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> On 13-07-16 04:32 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
> >>
> >>    Aside from subsystems like that mentioned above, all network related linux
> >>    development (i.e. RFC, review, comments, etc) takes place on netdev.
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > Should LKML be Cc'd? I assume so...
> 
> No, not unless there is a good reason to do so.
> 

That advice would run counter to what's in
Documentation/SubmittingPatches:

  6) Select your CC (e-mail carbon copy) list.

  Unless you have a reason NOT to do so, CC linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org.

Also, get-maintainers includes lkml all the time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html