lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 7 Aug 2013 20:41:25 +0200
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	Rui Xiang <rui.xiang@...wei.com>
CC:	<containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>, <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>,
	<ebiederm@...ssion.com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	<gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>, <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
	<libo.chen@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/11] syslog_ns: make permisiion check per user
 namespace

On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 15:37 +0800, Rui Xiang wrote:
> Use ns_capable to check capability in user ns,
> instead of capable function. The user ns is the
> owner of current syslog ns.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rui Xiang <rui.xiang@...wei.com>
> ---
>  kernel/printk.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/printk.c b/kernel/printk.c
> index e508ab2..ca951e7 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk.c
> @@ -374,13 +374,13 @@ static int check_syslog_permissions(int type, bool from_file,
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	if (syslog_action_restricted(type, ns)) {
> -		if (capable(CAP_SYSLOG))
> +		if (ns_capable(ns->owner, CAP_SYSLOG))
>  			return 0;
>  		/*
>  		 * For historical reasons, accept CAP_SYS_ADMIN too, with
>  		 * a warning.
>  		 */
> -		if (capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
> +		if (ns_capable(ns->owner, CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
>  			pr_warn_once("%s (%d): Attempt to access syslog with "
>  				     "CAP_SYS_ADMIN but no CAP_SYSLOG "
>  				     "(deprecated).\n",

Since CAP_SYS_ADMIN is only accepted for backward compatibility, is it
really necessary to accept it as a per-namespace capability too?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ