[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 15:35:44 -0700
From: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] veth: remove hardware checksum feature
On 08/08/2013 03:22 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-08-08 at 15:13 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
>
>> Looks like it should work nicely, except it would be really
>> nice if I could short-circuit the xmit_nit() part for my
>> protocol handler.
>>
>> Think there would be any interest in allowing the ptype_all
>> handlers to optionally register a direction (ie tx-only, rx-only, both)
>> and have dev_queue_xmit_nit() pay attention to that?
>
> Sure, it would also make sense to apply the BPF filter _before_ doing
> the skb_clone()
>
> Right now, we :
>
> clone packets
> -> deliver the clone to the sniffer.
> sniffer eventuall drops the packet after BPF filtering.
>
> Its trivial to test the tx/rx thing in BPF, and it's JIT code.
I'm actually registering the hook from a kernel module and
doing the bridging in this module. I'm not using sockets or
BPF like a sniffer would...
I think for my own use, just causing the skb_loop_sk() method to
return true would be optimal, but in general I like your idea.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists