lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 8 Aug 2013 10:21:24 +0800
From:	Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com>
To:	Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@...csson.com>
CC:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net>, <jon.maloy@...csson.com>
Subject: Re: skbs delivered to 'wrong' packet_type handler

On 08/07/2013 11:57 PM, Erik Hugne wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 06:55:43AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> Its not ignored, quite the contrary if you look at the code :
>>
>> vi +3595 net/core/dev.c
>>
>>         type = skb->protocol;
>>         list_for_each_entry_rcu(ptype,
>>                         &ptype_base[ntohs(type) & PTYPE_HASH_MASK], list) {
>>                 if (ptype->type == type &&
>>                     (ptype->dev == null_or_dev || ptype->dev == skb->dev ||
>>                      ptype->dev == orig_dev)) {
>>                         if (pt_prev)
>>                                 ret = deliver_skb(skb, pt_prev, orig_dev);
>>                         pt_prev = ptype;
>>                 }
>>         }
>>
>>
>> pkt->dev being set is only meaningful for packet sockets.
>>
>> Protocols themselves should not care. If they want to care, they must
>> add their own checks.
>>
>> Socket API has SO_BINDTODEVICE for this purpose.
>> IP layer has RP filtering.
>>
>> A protocol should register a single ptype with NULL dev.
>>
> 
> Very well, we'll have to fix the protocol registration and add appropriate 
> checks in TIPC then.

Currently the usage of what TIPC registers its protocol handler into
networking device is totally wrong because af_packet_priv in packet_type
should be only owned by AF_PACKET socket as well as ptype->dev is set
with a network device. But I am sure the patch in below link can
definitely fix your met issue although it's not a final version to be
submitted net-next:

http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.network.tipc.general/4159


Regards,
Ying

> But i fail to understand why a handler registered on the native device needs 
> to get the packets destined to a child vlan device (the ptype->dev == orig_dev 
> check).
> 
> //E
> 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists