| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 20:42:37 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To: Kumar Gaurav <kumargauravgupta3@...il.com>
cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>, t.sailer@...mni.ethz.ch,
jreuter@...na.de, jpr@...bb.org, linux-hams@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers:net:hamradio: Removing Depricated
IRQF_DISABLED
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
> On Saturday 10 August 2013 10:54 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Sat, 10 Aug 2013, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
> >
> > > On Saturday 10 August 2013 10:17 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > > If it is in a | with something else, I think you can just remove it.
> > > >
> > > > julia
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, 10 Aug 2013, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Removed IRQF_DISABLED as it's deprecated and should be removed
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gaurav <kumargauravgupta3@...il.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_ser_fdx.c | 2 +-
> > > > > drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_ser_hdx.c | 2 +-
> > > > > drivers/net/hamradio/scc.c | 2 +-
> > > > > drivers/net/hamradio/yam.c | 2 +-
> > > > > 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_ser_fdx.c
> > > > > b/drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_ser_fdx.c
> > > > > index a974727..c114009 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_ser_fdx.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_ser_fdx.c
> > > > > @@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ static int ser12_open(struct net_device *dev)
> > > > > outb(0, FCR(dev->base_addr)); /* disable FIFOs */
> > > > > outb(0x0d, MCR(dev->base_addr));
> > > > > outb(0, IER(dev->base_addr));
> > > > > - if (request_irq(dev->irq, ser12_interrupt, IRQF_DISABLED |
> > > > > IRQF_SHARED,
> > > > > + if (request_irq(dev->irq, ser12_interrupt, IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE |
> > > > > IRQF_SHARED,
> > > > > "baycom_ser_fdx", dev)) {
> > > > > release_region(dev->base_addr, SER12_EXTENT);
> > > > > return -EBUSY;
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_ser_hdx.c
> > > > > b/drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_ser_hdx.c
> > > > > index e349d86..d91c1fd 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_ser_hdx.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_ser_hdx.c
> > > > > @@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ static int ser12_open(struct net_device *dev)
> > > > > outb(0, FCR(dev->base_addr)); /* disable FIFOs */
> > > > > outb(0x0d, MCR(dev->base_addr));
> > > > > outb(0, IER(dev->base_addr));
> > > > > - if (request_irq(dev->irq, ser12_interrupt, IRQF_DISABLED |
> > > > > IRQF_SHARED,
> > > > > + if (request_irq(dev->irq, ser12_interrupt, IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE |
> > > > > IRQF_SHARED,
> > > > > "baycom_ser12", dev)) {
> > > > > release_region(dev->base_addr, SER12_EXTENT);
> > > > > return -EBUSY;
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/hamradio/scc.c b/drivers/net/hamradio/scc.c
> > > > > index bc1d521..4bc6ee8 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/net/hamradio/scc.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/hamradio/scc.c
> > > > > @@ -1734,7 +1734,7 @@ static int scc_net_ioctl(struct net_device *dev,
> > > > > struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd)
> > > > > if (!Ivec[hwcfg.irq].used && hwcfg.irq)
> > > > > {
> > > > > if (request_irq(hwcfg.irq, scc_isr,
> > > > > - IRQF_DISABLED, "AX.25
> > > > > SCC",
> > > > > + 0, "AX.25 SCC",
> > > > > (void *)(long)
> > > > > hwcfg.irq))
> > > > > printk(KERN_WARNING "z8530drv:
> > > > > warning, cannot get IRQ %d\n", hwcfg.irq);
> > > > > else
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/hamradio/yam.c b/drivers/net/hamradio/yam.c
> > > > > index 0721e72..f947887 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/net/hamradio/yam.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/hamradio/yam.c
> > > > > @@ -888,7 +888,7 @@ static int yam_open(struct net_device *dev)
> > > > > goto out_release_base;
> > > > > }
> > > > > outb(0, IER(dev->base_addr));
> > > > > - if (request_irq(dev->irq, yam_interrupt, IRQF_DISABLED |
> > > > > IRQF_SHARED,
> > > > > dev->name, dev)) {
> > > > > + if (request_irq(dev->irq, yam_interrupt, IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE |
> > > > > IRQF_SHARED, dev->name, dev)) {
> > > > > printk(KERN_ERR "%s: irq %d busy\n", dev->name,
> > > > > dev->irq);
> > > > > ret = -EBUSY;
> > > > > goto out_release_base;
> > > > > --
> > > > > 1.7.9.5
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> > > > > kernel-janitors"
> > > > > in
> > > > > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > > > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > > > >
> > > Yes i was suggested for using IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE too so used this. Please
> > > tell
> > > me if this makes any difference or issue?
> > I think that the suggestion was to use IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE only when
> > removing IRQF_DISABLED would leave nothing left.
> >
> > - IRQF_DISABLED | e
> > + e
> >
> > otherwise,
> >
> > - IRQF_DISABLED
> > + 0
> >
> > julia
> Sorry to prompt back but i'm confused. if removing IRQF_DISABLED leaves
> nothing then should i use 0 or IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE?
I don't know. I think you have to contact some maintainers of affected
code and find out what they prefer.
julia
> I'm convinced with
>
> - IRQF_DISABLED | e
> + e
>
> Regards
>
> Kumar Gaurav
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists