netdev - Re: [PATCHv2 net-next] 6lowpan: handle only real link-local addresses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 15 Aug 2013 06:57:21 +0200
From:	Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	alex.bluesman.smirnov@...il.com, dbaryshkov@...il.com,
	linux-zigbee-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next] 6lowpan: handle only real link-local addresses

Hi David,

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 05:18:25PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>
> Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 23:17:01 +0200
> 
> > Ok, please let me know what should I do to submit it properly.
> 
> What you don't understand is that just because patches aren't
> related doesn't mean that their order of application doesn't
> matter.
> 
Ok. I got the information on an other mailinglist that I should
not mix "features" and "fixes" in a single series. Then I just
try to seperate...

My first patch-serie included all patches in a single series.

> So you put all the patches into a full series so that there is no
> ambiguity as to what order the patches are to be applied.
> 
Ok.

> Do not ever seperate patches when you are submitting changes to the
> same exact files at one time.
Ok, I will remember it.

Thanks and apologize for the inconvenience

Regards
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html