netdev - Re: MASQUERADE/SNAT and multiple interfaces with the same IP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 16 Aug 2013 13:23:31 +0200
From:	Kristian Evensen <kristian.evensen@...il.com>
To:	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc:	netfilter@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: MASQUERADE/SNAT and multiple interfaces with the same IP

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de> wrote:
>> Does this mean that even when using SNAT, the old mapping is deleted
>> and a new created?
>
> No.

Thank you very much for the help, I see now that I was a little bit
too fast and missed a detail in nf_nat_oif_changed(). If anyone ever
stumbles across the question in the future: SNAT does not set
masq_index and, thus, nf_nat_oif_changed() will always return false.

Have a nice weekend!

-Kristian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html