lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 23 Aug 2013 11:44:20 +0530
From:	Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@...com>
To:	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
CC:	Daniel Mack <zonque@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<davem@...emloft.net>, <ujhelyi.m@...il.com>,
	<vaibhav.bedia@...com>, <d-gerlach@...com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] net: ethernet: cpsw: add support for hardware interface
 mode config

On Friday 23 August 2013 11:00 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> @@ -728,6 +736,44 @@ static void _cpsw_adjust_link(struct cpsw_slave *slave,
>> >  	u32			mac_control = 0;
>> >  	u32			slave_port;
>> >  
>> > +	if (priv->gmii_sel_reg && of_machine_is_compatible("ti,am33xx")) {
> This sounds like the DT version of cpu_is_am335x()! Looks like you need
> to introduce a new compatible "ti,am3352-cpsw" to indicate the AM3352
> specific features of the CPSW IP (yeah, control module is not really
> part of the IP, but by introducing it in the driver, we are treating it
> such anyway. And you can see this register as extension of IP since its
> not shared for any other purpose).
>

I also agree but it should be ti,am3352-cpsw or ti.am33xx-cpsw?

Regards
Mugunthan V N
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ