netdev - Re: BQL support in gianfar causes network hiccup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 02 Sep 2013 15:21:15 +0200
From:	Per Dalén <per.dalen@...eartv.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BQL support in gianfar causes network hiccup

 > On Mo, 2013-04-29 at 15:20 +0200, Tino Keitel wrote:
 > > On Mo, 2013-04-29 at 15:14 +0200, Claudiu Manoil wrote:
 > >
 > > > The proposed fix (passes this test):
 > > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/240365/
 > > >
 > > > Does it work for you?

Hi,

This patch do not work for me. I have the same problems that Tino on my 
card. My card is a Freescale P2020 and I use "iperf -c 10.10.51.36 -n 
100M -P 50" to trigger the error.
The network interface is set to 100M half duplex.
I have tested this using 3.4.35 and 3.4.60 kernel.

NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (fsl-gianfar): transmit queue 0 timed out
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c:256
Modules linked in:
NIP: c039bb94 LR: c039bb94 CTR: c02ee500
REGS: dffe7e60 TRAP: 0700   Not tainted  (3.4.60+)
MSR: 00029000 <CE,EE,ME>  CR: 40000084  XER: 20000000
TASK = df843200[0] 'swapper/1' THREAD: df864000 CPU: 1
GPR00: c039bb94 dffe7f10 df843200 00000046 00021000 ffffffff c02eecf0 
00029000
GPR08: 00000001 00008000 00463000 00003fff 80000028 00000000 00000000 
00000004
GPR16: 00000001 df858e14 c051f1f4 00000001 df858c14 df858a14 df858814 
ffffffff
GPR24: 00000001 df813234 00000004 df8f9a00 c05e0000 c05e0000 df813000 
00000000
NIP [c039bb94] dev_watchdog+0x2d4/0x2e4
LR [c039bb94] dev_watchdog+0x2d4/0x2e4
Call Trace:
[dffe7f10] [c039bb94] dev_watchdog+0x2d4/0x2e4 (unreliable)
[dffe7f40] [c003e944] run_timer_softirq+0x11c/0x20c
[dffe7fa0] [c00377dc] __do_softirq+0xe4/0x16c
[dffe7ff0] [c000c408] call_do_softirq+0x14/0x24
[df865e80] [c00043c4] do_softirq+0xb4/0xe4
[df865ea0] [c0037b4c] irq_exit+0xb0/0xcc
[df865eb0] [c0008958] timer_interrupt+0x188/0x1a4
[df865ee0] [c000db68] ret_from_except+0x0/0x18
--- Exception: 901 at cpu_idle+0x90/0xf4
     LR = cpu_idle+0x90/0xf4
[df865fa0] [c0007b30] cpu_idle+0x5c/0xf4 (unreliable)
[df865fc0] [c049d68c] start_secondary+0x2b0/0x2b4
[df865ff0] [c0001cf8] __secondary_start+0x30/0x84
Instruction dump:
4e800421 80fe0244 4bffff40 7fc3f378 4bfeab6d 7fc4f378 7c651b78 3c60c055
7fe6fb78 38633108 4cc63182 480fc889 <0fe00000> 39200001 993cea1a 4bffffb4
---[ end trace 4be011773b23dae3 ]---


When I revert "gianfar: Add support for byte queue limits.", commit 
d8a0f1b0af67679bba886784de10d8c21acc4e0e, the network test work fine 
without any "hiccup".
If the network interface is set to 1000M full duplex there's also no 
"hiccup".

 >
 > Hi,
 >
 > I tested the patch over the weekend and it looks fine. I then re-checked
 > without the patch and got the bug immediately. So the patch seems to
 > work fine.
 >

Thanks,
Per Dalén
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html