netdev - Re: pull-request: can-next 2013-08-29

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 03 Sep 2013 21:56:04 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	mkl@...gutronix.de
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: pull-request: can-next 2013-08-29

From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 21:06:10 +0200

> Hello David,
> 
> On 08/29/2013 11:13 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> this is a pull request for net-next. There are two patches from Gerhard
>> Sittig, which improves the clock handling on mpc5121. Oliver Hartkopp
>> provides a patch that adds a per rule limitation of frame hops.
> 
> have you forgotten this pull request?

If you actually checked the patchwork queue, you're see that this pull
request was still "under review" and there are people who have been
waiting much longer than you have.

I just pulled this in and will push it out once my build tests complete.

There is no reason for you to ever ask me the above question unless
your pull request doesn't show up in patchwork in an appropriate
state.  By default assume I am backlogged and I will get to it
whenever time and my resources allow.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html