netdev - Re: [PATCH net] net: sctp: fix smatch warning in sctp_send_asconf_del

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Sep 2013 16:14:10 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	dborkman@...hat.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
	nhorman@...driver.com, micchie@....wide.ad.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: sctp: fix smatch warning in
 sctp_send_asconf_del_ip

From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Date: Sat,  7 Sep 2013 20:51:21 +0200

> This was originally reported in [1] and posted by Neil Horman [2], he said:
> 
>   Fix up a missed null pointer check in the asconf code. If we don't find
>   a local address, but we pass in an address length of more than 1, we may
>   dereference a NULL laddr pointer. Currently this can't happen, as the only
>   users of the function pass in the value 1 as the addrcnt parameter, but
>   its not hot path, and it doesn't hurt to check for NULL should that ever
>   be the case.
> 
> The callpath from sctp_asconf_mgmt() looks okay. But this could be triggered
> from sctp_setsockopt_bindx() call with SCTP_BINDX_REM_ADDR and addrcnt > 1
> while passing all possible addresses from the bind list to SCTP_BINDX_REM_ADDR
> so that we do *not* find a single address in the association's bind address
> list that is not in the packed array of addresses. If this happens when we
> have an established association with ASCONF-capable peers, then we could get
> a NULL pointer dereference as we only check for laddr == NULL && addrcnt == 1
> and call later sctp_make_asconf_update_ip() with NULL laddr.
> 
> BUT: this actually won't happen as sctp_bindx_rem() will catch such a case
> and return with an error earlier. As this is incredably unintuitive and error
> prone, add a check to catch at least future bugs here. As Neil says, its not
> hot path. Introduced by 8a07eb0a5 ("sctp: Add ASCONF operation on the
> single-homed host").
> 
>  [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sctp/msg02132.html
>  [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sctp/msg02133.html
> 
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>

Applied and queued up for -stable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html