netdev - Re: [PATCH net 2/3] lib: introduce upper case hex ascii helpers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 19 Sep 2013 11:38:29 +0200
From:	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Thiago Farina <tfransosi@...il.com>,
	Andre Naujoks <nautsch2@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	Vladimir Kondratiev <qca_vkondrat@....qualcomm.com>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/3] lib: introduce upper case hex ascii helpers

On 09/15/2013 06:35 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 01:27:03 -0300 Thiago Farina <tfransosi@...il.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Andre Naujoks <nautsch2@...il.com> wrote:
>>> To be able to use the hex ascii functions in case sensitive environments
>>> the array hex_asc_upper[] and the needed functions for hex_byte_pack_upper()
>>> are introduced.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andre Naujoks <nautsch2@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>>  include/linux/kernel.h | 11 +++++++++++
>>>  lib/hexdump.c          |  2 ++
>>>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
>>> index 482ad2d..672ddc4 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
>>> @@ -439,6 +439,17 @@ static inline char *hex_byte_pack(char *buf, u8 byte)
>>>         return buf;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> +extern const char hex_asc_upper[];
>>> +#define hex_asc_upper_lo(x)    hex_asc_upper[((x) & 0x0f)]
>>> +#define hex_asc_upper_hi(x)    hex_asc_upper[((x) & 0xf0) >> 4]
>> Does using a macro instead of a real function (static inline)
>> generates a better code?
> 
> Yes, a static inline would be nicer, but these are derived from
> hex_asc_lo/hex_asc_hi.  If we change one we should change the other
> and that becomes a separate cleanup.  So I think this patch is
> OK as-is.

Is this an Acked-by?

> Also, it would make sense to get all the *hex* stuff out of kernel.h
> and into a new header file (hexchar.h?).  They're a clean
> self-contained thing and kernel.h is rather a dumping ground.

Who is taking this series?

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (260 bytes)