| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:47:07 +0200
From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jiri@...nulli.us, Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>,
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 net-next 27/27] net: create sysfs symlinks for neighbour devices
Also, remove the same functionality from bonding - it will be already done
for any device that links to its lower/upper neighbour.
The links will be created for dev's kobject, and will look like
lower_eth0 for lower device eth0 and upper_bridge0 for upper device
bridge0.
CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
---
Notes:
v3 -> v4:
Convert the logic to the new functions, which don't have the bool upper
argument.
v2 -> v3:
No change.
v1 -> v2:
No changes.
RFC -> v1:
Rename lower devices from slave_eth0 to lower_eth0, so that it meets
the lower/upper naming. I've searched for any active users of bonding's
slave_eth0, and seems that nobody's actively using it or relying on it.
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 11 +----------
drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c | 21 ---------------------
drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h | 2 --
net/core/dev.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index d494045..d5c3153 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -1612,15 +1612,11 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
read_unlock(&bond->lock);
- res = bond_create_slave_symlinks(bond_dev, slave_dev);
- if (res)
- goto err_detach;
-
res = netdev_rx_handler_register(slave_dev, bond_handle_frame,
new_slave);
if (res) {
pr_debug("Error %d calling netdev_rx_handler_register\n", res);
- goto err_dest_symlinks;
+ goto err_detach;
}
res = bond_master_upper_dev_link(bond_dev, slave_dev, new_slave);
@@ -1642,9 +1638,6 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
err_unregister:
netdev_rx_handler_unregister(slave_dev);
-err_dest_symlinks:
- bond_destroy_slave_symlinks(bond_dev, slave_dev);
-
err_detach:
if (!USES_PRIMARY(bond->params.mode))
bond_hw_addr_flush(bond_dev, slave_dev);
@@ -1842,8 +1835,6 @@ static int __bond_release_one(struct net_device *bond_dev,
bond_dev->name, slave_dev->name, bond_dev->name);
/* must do this from outside any spinlocks */
- bond_destroy_slave_symlinks(bond_dev, slave_dev);
-
vlan_vids_del_by_dev(slave_dev, bond_dev);
/* If the mode USES_PRIMARY, then this cases was handled above by
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
index 1c57246..e06c644 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
@@ -168,27 +168,6 @@ static const struct class_attribute class_attr_bonding_masters = {
.namespace = bonding_namespace,
};
-int bond_create_slave_symlinks(struct net_device *master,
- struct net_device *slave)
-{
- char linkname[IFNAMSIZ+7];
-
- /* create a link from the master to the slave */
- sprintf(linkname, "slave_%s", slave->name);
- return sysfs_create_link(&(master->dev.kobj), &(slave->dev.kobj),
- linkname);
-}
-
-void bond_destroy_slave_symlinks(struct net_device *master,
- struct net_device *slave)
-{
- char linkname[IFNAMSIZ+7];
-
- sprintf(linkname, "slave_%s", slave->name);
- sysfs_remove_link(&(master->dev.kobj), linkname);
-}
-
-
/*
* Show the slaves in the current bond.
*/
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
index 18116ec..1fd37c8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
@@ -437,8 +437,6 @@ int bond_create(struct net *net, const char *name);
int bond_create_sysfs(struct bond_net *net);
void bond_destroy_sysfs(struct bond_net *net);
void bond_prepare_sysfs_group(struct bonding *bond);
-int bond_create_slave_symlinks(struct net_device *master, struct net_device *slave);
-void bond_destroy_slave_symlinks(struct net_device *master, struct net_device *slave);
int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev);
int bond_release(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev);
void bond_mii_monitor(struct work_struct *);
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index de443ee..25ab6fe 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -4584,6 +4584,7 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
void *private, bool master)
{
struct netdev_adjacent *adj;
+ char linkname[IFNAMSIZ+7];
int ret;
adj = __netdev_find_adj(dev, adj_dev, dev_list);
@@ -4606,12 +4607,26 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
pr_debug("dev_hold for %s, because of link added from %s to %s\n",
adj_dev->name, dev->name, adj_dev->name);
+ if (dev_list == &dev->adj_list.lower) {
+ sprintf(linkname, "lower_%s", adj_dev->name);
+ ret = sysfs_create_link(&(dev->dev.kobj),
+ &(adj_dev->dev.kobj), linkname);
+ if (ret)
+ goto free_adj;
+ } else if (dev_list == &dev->adj_list.upper) {
+ sprintf(linkname, "upper_%s", adj_dev->name);
+ ret = sysfs_create_link(&(dev->dev.kobj),
+ &(adj_dev->dev.kobj), linkname);
+ if (ret)
+ goto free_adj;
+ }
+
/* Ensure that master link is always the first item in list. */
if (master) {
ret = sysfs_create_link(&(dev->dev.kobj),
&(adj_dev->dev.kobj), "master");
if (ret)
- goto free_adj;
+ goto remove_symlinks;
list_add_rcu(&adj->list, dev_list);
} else {
@@ -4620,6 +4635,15 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
return 0;
+remove_symlinks:
+ if (dev_list == &dev->adj_list.lower) {
+ sprintf(linkname, "lower_%s", adj_dev->name);
+ sysfs_remove_link(&(dev->dev.kobj), linkname);
+ } else if (dev_list == &dev->adj_list.upper) {
+ sprintf(linkname, "upper_%s", adj_dev->name);
+ sysfs_remove_link(&(dev->dev.kobj), linkname);
+ }
+
free_adj:
kfree(adj);
@@ -4631,6 +4655,7 @@ void __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev,
struct list_head *dev_list)
{
struct netdev_adjacent *adj;
+ char linkname[IFNAMSIZ+7];
adj = __netdev_find_adj(dev, adj_dev, dev_list);
@@ -4650,6 +4675,14 @@ void __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev,
if (adj->master)
sysfs_remove_link(&(dev->dev.kobj), "master");
+ if (dev_list == &dev->adj_list.lower) {
+ sprintf(linkname, "lower_%s", adj_dev->name);
+ sysfs_remove_link(&(dev->dev.kobj), linkname);
+ } else if (dev_list == &dev->adj_list.upper) {
+ sprintf(linkname, "upper_%s", adj_dev->name);
+ sysfs_remove_link(&(dev->dev.kobj), linkname);
+ }
+
list_del_rcu(&adj->list);
pr_debug("dev_put for %s, because link removed from %s to %s\n",
adj_dev->name, dev->name, adj_dev->name);
--
1.8.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists