netdev - Re: [PATCH net] bridge: allow receiption on disabled port

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 11 Oct 2013 08:10:36 -0700
From:	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:	Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bridge: allow receiption on disabled port

On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:18:15 +0200
Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org> wrote:

> On 2013-10-11 4:35 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > This is what I was thinking would be better.
> > 
> > Don't want these packets leaking into PRE_ROUTEING chain or have
> > any chance to get flooded out other ports.
> > 
> > Compile tested only...
> > 
> > I could use another goto instead but that becomes spaghetti and
> > never like to jump back into a block.
> [...]
> >  forward:
> >  	switch (p->state) {
> > +	case BR_STATE_DISABLED:
> > +		if (!ether_addr_equal(p->br->dev->dev_addr, dest))
> > +			goto drop;
> Checking against the bridge device address isn't enough, WPA EAPOL
> packets are addressed to the wifi device MAC address.

Correct, this should be skb->dev->dev_addr which matchs against
the MAC address that frame arrived on.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html