netdev - Re: [net-next 11/14] i40e: reorder block declarations in debugfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 18 Oct 2013 10:42:50 -0700
From:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com, a@...r.kernel.org,
	shannon.nelson@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com,
	sassmann@...hat.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 11/14] i40e: reorder block declarations in debugfs

On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 13:38 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 07:34:52 -0700
> 
> > On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 18:13 +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> >> On 18-10-2013 17:23, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> >> 
> >> > From: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...el.com>
> >> 
> >> > This is a cleanup of the arguments declared at the beginning
> >> > of each function.
> >> 
> >>     I hope you meant "local variables" because "arguments" are the
> >> values 
> >> passed to a function.
> > 
> > Yes, he meant local variables.
> 
> There is probably going to be some other feedback to address, so please
> fix this commit message when you respin this series.
> 
> Thanks Jeff.

Ok, I will wait for additional feedback before re-sending the series.  I
do not want to waste your time and mine re-spinning the series if there
is additional feedback.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)