lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 11:09:12 +0800 From: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com> To: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>, Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>, Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 2/5] bonding: remove bond read lock for bond_alb_monitor() The bond slave list may change when the monitor is running, the slave list is no longer protected by bond->lock, only protected by rtnl lock(), so we has 3 way to modify it: 1.add bond_master_upper_dev_link() and bond_upper_dev_unlink() in bond->lock, but it is unsafe to call call_netdevice_notifiers() in write lock. 2.remove unused bond->lock for monitor function, only use the exist rtnl lock(). 3.use rcu_read_lock() to protect it, of course, it will transform bond_for_each_slave to bond_for_each_slave_rcu() and performance is better, but in slow path, it is ignored. so I remove the bond->lock and move the rtnl lock to protect the whole monitor function. Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com> --- drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 20 ++++---------------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c index 0287240..5d79f5e 100644 --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c @@ -1495,11 +1495,13 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work) struct list_head *iter; struct slave *slave; - read_lock(&bond->lock); + if (!rtnl_trylock()) + goto re_arm; if (!bond_has_slaves(bond)) { bond_info->tx_rebalance_counter = 0; bond_info->lp_counter = 0; + rtnl_unlock(); goto re_arm; } @@ -1548,16 +1550,6 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work) if (bond_info->primary_is_promisc && (++bond_info->rlb_promisc_timeout_counter >= RLB_PROMISC_TIMEOUT)) { - /* - * dev_set_promiscuity requires rtnl and - * nothing else. Avoid race with bond_close. - */ - read_unlock(&bond->lock); - if (!rtnl_trylock()) { - read_lock(&bond->lock); - goto re_arm; - } - bond_info->rlb_promisc_timeout_counter = 0; /* If the primary was set to promiscuous mode @@ -1566,9 +1558,6 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work) */ dev_set_promiscuity(bond->curr_active_slave->dev, -1); bond_info->primary_is_promisc = 0; - - rtnl_unlock(); - read_lock(&bond->lock); } if (bond_info->rlb_rebalance) { @@ -1591,10 +1580,9 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work) } } + rtnl_unlock(); re_arm: queue_delayed_work(bond->wq, &bond->alb_work, alb_delta_in_ticks); - - read_unlock(&bond->lock); } /* assumption: called before the slave is attached to the bond -- 1.8.2.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists