| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 21:15:51 -0700 From: Jerry Chu <hkchu@...gle.com> To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Christoph Paasch <christoph.paasch@...ouvain.be>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Michael Dalton <mwdalton@...gle.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: introduce gro_frag_list_enable sysctl On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:08:18PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 09:06:52PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> > >> > I am not sure 64K GRO packets that must be segmented are going to be >> > faster than 22K packets without segmentation at all (TSO path on xmit) >> >> Indeed that is a tough call, but I think conceptually the 64K >> case is much nicer than a sysctl that gets magically turned off. > > Also at some point we'll want to do >64K GRO/GSO too so we'll > have to face this complexity one day. Not sure how this is possible with the IP datagram length limit. (Am I missing something, like pkt chaining?) Jerry > > Cheers, > -- > Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> > Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ > PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists