netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: sctp: fix and consolidate SCTP checksumming code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 04 Nov 2013 13:11:34 +0100
From:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
To:	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
CC:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: sctp: fix and consolidate SCTP checksumming
 code

On 10/30/2013 03:29 PM, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> On 10/30/2013 06:50 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
[...]
> Daniel
>
> Here is a follow-on idea that might help even more.
> What if we put a pointer to skb_checksum_ops() in the skb
> somewhere (I was thinking of skb_shinfo).  Then
> skb_checksum can simply use the data from there.  This would
> allow us to get rid of all the special cases in SCTP that do
> checksumming.  We can just set it to partial, set up the right
> fields and let HW or SW always do the right thing.

I need to think about this a bit. This would certainly have the
negative side-effect of a higher skb->truesize usage and thus
affecting memory accounting for everyone as we extend
skb_shared_info.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html