[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:31:23 -0800
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>,
Sujith Manoharan <sujith@...jith.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: TCP performance regression
Ah, this thread started with a huge regression in ath10k performance
with the new TSQ stuff, and isn't actually about a two line fix to the
mv ethernet driver.
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/290269
I suddenly care a lot more. And I'll care a lot, lot, lot more, if
someone can post a rrul test for before and after the new fq scheduler
and tsq change on this driver on this hardware... What, if anything,
in terms of improvements or regressions, happened to multi-stream
throughput and latency?
https://github.com/tohojo/netperf-wrapper
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists